Sales Process: Even a Man Lost Knows Where He Wants to Go

Posted by Dan McDade

Find me on:
on Oct 16, 2009 9:58:00 AM

Lead Generation Featured Image

(Part 2 of 3)

Last week we talked about the state of lead generation and why most companies do not provide field sales with high quality sales opportunities. This week we are going to talk about what happens after a lead has been turned over to sales and why so few dollars in revenue are generated from so much lead generation investment.

Traditionally sales people are viewed as being able to convince, persuade, handle objections ... a very provincial view. Michael Bosworth, in his book "Customer Centric Selling" says it best: "Traditionally sales people are viewed as being able to convince, persuade, handle objection, overcome resistance, etc. This is a very traditional view of what sales is and it's a very manipulative way to sell. Buyers don't like to be manipulated. Buyers like to buy things, they just don't like to feel they are being sold to as part of the process."

In the sales process there is what I call "no man's land". A former colleague taught that buyers of anything, from chewing gum to complex, enterprise software solutions, go through four phases in the process of acquiring a good or service:

  • Awareness
  • Interest
  • Preference
  • Commitment

Marketing owns Awareness and Interest.

Sales owns Commitment.

Marketing and sales own Preference—building preference for your product or solution over other available products or solutions. Preference can happen immediately, or take weeks or months to develop. Marketing should own Preference on those leads requiring nurturing. Sales should own Preference on sales ready leads.

Preference is the sales process "no man's land", and it is costing companies hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars.

The way many companies operate today, unfiltered "raw leads" are sent to sales after companies with Awareness and Interest are identified. Sales is ill equipped to filter through the large quantity of so-called opportunities they are sent, so at best they cherry pick what appear to be the best opportunities (sometimes accurately and sometimes not). The rest of the "raw leads" end up inactive in some SFA or CRM system—essentially wasted.

If as few as 3 - 7 out of 100 "raw leads" are sales ready, what chance does your sales force have of finding real leads if they are sent batches of "raw leads" by marketing? And, what chance is there that qualified, longer-term opportunities will be effectively nurtured. I say: slim, and none. Even a man lost in the woods knows those odds are not going to result in ROI.

Next week we will talk about why the use of the telephone is critical to the prospecting process.

 

By Dan McDade


Tell us what you think!

Topics: Lead Generation, Marketing & Sales Alignment


Revenue - Inbound - Nurturing = The GAP. We guarantee you'll be surprised by your actual metrics. Try our Lead Revenue Calculator
Get the Calculator

filter blog posts

  • Search

Top 5 posts

How Much Leads Cost

I review a lot of content on this topic and am amazed at what I find written about lead cost. For example:

Why Don’t Companies Want to Talk to Anyone?

It’s truly strange when companies enter the stealth mode. They hide phone numbers, dial-by-name directories, and employee names,..

What Should the Sales Close Rate Be?

I’ve read and heard (from a well-known industry analyst firm) that best-in-class companies close 30% of sales qualified leads..

Gold Calling vs. Cold Calling

I've written many blog posts on the fact that cold calling isn't dead. In fact, doing the right amount of research, adding a..